ZEMCH 2015 - International Conference Proceedings | Page 499

Correlations and Comparative Analyses Spearman’s correlation analysis evidenced that income decile, age, and occupation of the heads of household were the strongest demographic indicators for self-help personalisation works (Table 5). Income was moderately correlated to floor finishing works and construction of external roofs, whilst weakly correlated to wall finishing works and builder type. The age of the head of household was strongly correlated to size of the extensions, whilst moderately correlated to the construction of exterior fences and sheds, and weakly correlated to finishing works. In parallel, the occupation of the heads of household were moderately correlated to the construction of external pavements, whist weakly correlated to the presence of anchored furniture, wall finishing works, and to the absence of any modifications. Besides, number of household nuclei was weakly correlated to the type furniture used to store clothing (rs=-0.218, n=89, p=.041), while the number of workers per household was moderately correlated to the presence of exterior fences (rs=-0.362, n=40, p=.022). Table 5. Spearman’s Correlation results between demographic and personalisation variables Independent Variable Dependent Variable household income decile floor finishing works Coef. Sig. n +0.359 <.001 98 external roofs -0.320 =.045 38 wall finishing works +0.280 =.005 100 builder type +0.221 =.026 102 extension size +0.449 =.017 28 exterior fences -0.386 =.027 33 exterior shed -0.318 =.049 39 wall finishing works +0.299 =.002 106 occupation h. household exterior pavements +0.334 =.008 43 anchored furniture +0.273 =.008 94 wall finishing works +0.241 =.013 105 no modifications -0.229 =.021 102 age h. household The results of correlation analysis between satisfaction levels and personalisation strategies are summarized in Table 6. In terms of satisfaction with the current architectural conditions of the dwellings, the measured surface area of the built extensions was positively correlated to the interviewees’ perception of the lot size and extension possibilities for their dwelling but negatively correlated to their appraisal on bathroom location and number of bedrooms. The presence of modifications to kitchen partitions was positively correlated to the users’ perception of current kitchen size and modification capabilities of their dwelling while complete absence of modifications was negatively correlated to the users’ perception of the current finishing works of their dwellings. No significant correlations were found between personalisation strategies and satisfaction levels regarding the size of the dwellings. Nonetheless, demographic variables such as number of users and number of nuclei were correlated to satisfaction levels with dwelling size (rs=-0.291, n=108, p=.002 and rs=0.223, n=108, p=.018 respectively), while number of users and income decile were correlated to number of bedrooms satisfaction levels (rs=-0.525, n=108, p<.001 and rs=-0.231, n=104, p=.018 respectively). In terms of satisfaction with the current environmental conditions of the dwellings, the development of extensions for kitchen purposes was negatively correlated to satisfaction on moisture Personalisation strategies and residential satisfaction in chilean social housing 497