Vermont Bar Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2 Summer 2014, Vol. 40, No. 2 | Page 33

www.vtbar.org liant academy facilitator D. Bates went on VPR to debate the constitutionality of restorative justice processes versus the constitutionality of plea-bargaining with the attorney general and the defender general. But these attorneys never even showed up nor could they be reached by VPR although they had promised to be on the show and in the studio beforehand. D. Bates then gave the radio address about the national need for criminal justice reform and the opportunity Vermont had to lead the nation in this vital field. His speech hit home with the public and key members of the legislature, which finally found the political will to start reforming Vermont’s criminal justice statutes. Bates’ speech also set forth the ideas that became the initial platform for the Justice Party, which has given us so many great legislatures and recent governors. Though Bates was sued for slander by the attorney general and defender general for his comments concerning their non-appearances, the case was eventually dismissed with prejudice and affirmed on appeal. It is hard to believe today how far we’ve come. Of course, our school system with the adoption of restorative processes in place of automatic disciplinary suspensions and expulsions in the 2020s also helped create the sensibility of the modern Vermont judge, jurist, and legislator, all of whom zealously safeguard justice matters from being hijacked out of the hands of citizens into their own hands under the false pretext of saving “the system” time and money, or whatever other bogeyman reason savvy troublemakers care to raise. And the ability of Vermont’s students and citizens to resolve conflicts peacefully and civilly through the use of circles and group conferences is world-renowned. It’s no wonder New York, still adhering to justice by plea-bargain, has built its sixteen foot fence on our border to deter its citizens from taking up residence here. Dean Free refuses to side with the critics who claim restorative justice processes are “unfair” because they “create different outcomes,” “are too emotional,” “ too time consuming,” and “give people headaches.” He also claims Vermont’s plea-bargaining free justice system has attracted many of the “new age” spiritual communities that have taken up residence in our state whose adherents have developed many of the seemingly miraculous methods of meditation-transportation techniques in use today, which as we all know have reduced pollution and resulted in fewer automobiles on Vermont’s scenic highways. To THE VERMONT BAR JOURNAL • SUMMER 2014 SPECIAL ISSUE: “Justice Goal Achieved” tion of human ignominy. Personally, I like to think that the founder of our academy, Professor Prometheus Gale, really set the stage for Vermont to become the restorative state it is today. Bucking the “hard” science forces of the time that had a stranglehold on the educational environment at the University—science departments at the time actually disparaged the notion of the power of the personal narrative in one’s life—he persuaded its president, U. C. Farr, to allow him to create a masters degree program in restorative justice facilitation. And, as we are proud to note, our program draws upon the classical roots of rhetoric and logic that emerged reunited after the Second World War in modern argumentation theory.2 His adherence to the roots of restorative justice in antiquity helped him sway the president and the university’s board—it also distinguished his academy from that of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania Restorative Justice Academy, which relied on a twentieth century social science theory of our emotional natures. But Professor Prometheus did more than just root the academy in the wisdom of antiquity. He brought forth his own “fire from heaven,” as ݔ