Vermont Bar Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2 Spring 2014, Vol. 40, No. 1 | Page 43

by Anna Saxman, Esq. THE CHILDREN’S CORNER Improving Outcomes for Families in Juvenile Court: The Defender General’s Family Support Project The Office of the Defender General, by statute, provides representation to children and parents in abuse and neglect cases as well as truancy and delinquency cases. In 2009, the Defender General was concerned with what appeared to be the relatively high rate of children in DCF custody; the ODG wanted to see if we could improve parental representation. At that time, according to the ABA, Vermont had the ninth highest percentage of children in DCF custody in the nation.1 Many of the attorneys representing parents felt that the deck was stacked against their clients due to poverty and the associated lack of housing, child care, and access to transportation. The clients also had multiple needs for substance abuse and mental health treatment. The courts were concerned that it was difficult for the attorneys to contact their clients and time was wasted while the attorneys met with the clients at the courthouse for an update. To address these issues the Defender General developed a program called the Family Support Project, which provides trained advocates of diverse backgrounds—some social workers, therapists, a former teacher, some former substance abuse providers, even one attorney—to work with the parents and the parent’s attorneys in helping parents access needed services in order to reunify with their children. The project is based upon the belief that all families should be given the assistance and resources to parent their children safely and well. This project was modelled after the Washington State Public Defender’s Parents Representation Program, which was started in 2000 and has been shown to be very successful. In a review of three similar projects, researchers found that “improving legal representation and support for parents in child welfare proceedings results in better outcomes for children and families and can lead to substantial savings of government funds.”2 The Washington State program has shown a 39% increase in the rate of reunification of families and has shortened the time to all permanency outcomes.3 The Washington State program started with more than $500,000 of new money to fund the program. In contrast, the Defender General’s office began the program with no new money. Starting in Chittenden County, we www.vtbar.org hired one family support worker, who became the model for our other counties. We now have six family support workers covering Chittenden, Addison, Franklin, Windham, Windsor, and Orleans counties and are looking for more workers. Our FSWs are not employees of the Defender General but are hired on a case-by-case basis. An attorney representing a parent in an abuse and neglect case (a “CHINS” case) may request a family support worker to assist the parent in keeping or regaining custody of their children. The family support worker gains the trust of the parents and meets with them in their homes. The workers provide help in finding housing, accessing substance abuse or mental health treatment, finding jobs, and attending visitation, parenting skills classes, and team meetings. Here are some representative examples of how the project has helped. A young drug-addicted mother with learning disabilities had an infant with complex medical issues. The Department of Children and Families (DCF) took the child into custody. With the help of a dedicated family support worker, DCF, and a good lawyer, she was able to have visitation with the child every day during the week for several hours and was able to Skype with him on other occasions. The mother got into a good drug rehab program and, with very little backsliding, was able to become clean. She is a devoted member of AA now. She also got into mental health treatment. Although there were concerns that she would not be able to learn how to care for her child’s significant medical needs, she and the family support worker attended every class the nurses offered on dealing with the child’s special issues. With the support of her worker, the mother showed DCF she could learn and take care of her child. The child is now at home in her custody and thriving. But for the dedicated support of the family support worker and DCF’s willingness to give this young mother a chance, the child would never have been reunited with his mother. In another case, the mother was living with an abusive partner and her three children when they became homeless. DCF took the children into custody upon reports of neglect by both parents and abuse by the father. The parents lived for a while i