The Good Economist June 2016 | Page 6

Emerging

Policy

A bill introduced by Councilwoman Helen Gym would require businesses that benefit from special tax incentives (valued at more than $50,000 per year) at the local or state level to publicly report the total value of subsidies they receive each year.

The “Subsidy Accountability Bill” also requires reporting on the number and quality of jobs created by businesses that receive subsidies. Subsidized businesses would be required to report the number of people they employ at the beginning and end of the year in which they received the subsidy, as well as the next five years after receiving the subsidy.

Policies such as this one are needed to move all businesses to invest in our communities the way small businesses do. Small businesses create more jobs locally and provide better wages. 85 percent of small business owners pay all of their employees more than the minimum wage. Local small businesses also have a positive economic multiplier effect that helps ensure that local dollars will remain and recirculate within the community.

Improved policy making begins with greater accountability and transparency. There is no way of knowing whether current incentives are effective at promoting growth because outcome data is not available. Serious deficiencies in existing program data prevents a comprehensive and quantifiable assessment of the overall operation and effectiveness of the program. Improved transparency in economic development spending is key to developing policies that truly result in economic growth.

While small business is routinely praised for their contributions to economic growth and job creation, big business actually receives the dominant share of economic development incentives awards. Between 2010 and 2014, large companies captured 89 percent of the $49.7 million awarded by the Pennsylvania Job Creation Tax Credit. The main problem is these huge incentives, which are aimed for the purpose of job creation, have become a retention mechanism for a corporation that threatens to leave. Meanwhile, small business leaders are rooted in their communities and have repeatedly watched large subsidized incentive companies come and go.

It is widely acknowledged that local, small businesses are the primary driver of employment growth in the region. Small businesses form the backbone of Philadelphia’s economy and create jobs at a faster pace than larger companies. 98 percent of Philadelphia businesses are small businesses with fewer than 50 employees. Many fill gaps in services that larger businesses do not prove, while others implement business strategies that address individualized community needs, such as allowing payment arrangements for needy patrons and providing skill development to local youth through job experience. Small businesses create over half of the jobs in the city (54%), and, yet despite all this, their interests in economic development issues are not effectively represented.

Attracting large corporations that will leave after their incentive is finished is not the authentic investment our communities need. We need investment that ensures more Philadelphians have stable jobs, earn decent wages, and have access to the benefits they need to keep their families healthy and economically secure. We must foster a business culture that says “if we are striving for business and job creation in the city, we are seeking to create good jobs and better companies-- those don’t just have an economic impact, but a broader social one, too.”

using the incentives to increase the adoption of clean energy technologies. So, it is not surprising that the issue became an important topic during the most recent mayoral election, with several candidates offering their own proposals containing varied aims.

Domb, a realtor elected to City Council last November, stated his goal is to spur private investment in underdeveloped, outlaying neighborhoods - such as North and West Philadelphia - that have been largely left out of the recent development boom. However, the potential beneficiaries of this legislation will not be limited to these neighborhoods. It could be a huge boon for condominium development as well. A developer could construct a 20-unit complex in which each condo buyer is entitled to receive a 20-year abatement so long as the purchase price is less than $250,000.

Regardless of who stands to gain, the bill is headed for an uphill political climb. It must clear a series of hurdles both here as well as in Harrisburg. The General Assembly will have to grant permissive legislation considering a clause in the Pennsylvania Constitution requires municipalities to tax all properties uniformly.

effective tax rate of negative 11.1 percent between 2008 and 2012, receiving refunds in the billions. While the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the CFC Look-Through Rule would reduce revenues by about $21.8 billion over the 2016-2025 period. These figures levy a broader public cost aside from their sheer financial magnitude. Lost tax revenue bring about changes to public spending priorities as well as increase the federal deficit.

Despite their substantial price tag, Congress permanently enshrined the Active Financing Exception into law and extended the CFC Look-Through Rule for another five years as part of the omnibus spending deal.

These two tax loopholes benefit multinational corporations at the expense of small business. Multinational corporations are permitted to thrive off of American infrastructure, economy, and education, while, at the same time, failing to contribute their fair share in taxes. A 2014 report by U.S. Public Interest Research Group found that 82 of the 100 largest publicly traded U.S. companies diverted revenue offshore to avoid taxes. Small businesses, in turn, are proud to pay taxes and invest in their communities. However, this commitment to domestic investment should not be at the expense of multinational corporations. Pennsylvania small businesses would need to pay an average of $4,217 in additional taxes in order to make up the difference in government revenue lost by tax avoidance.

Businesses should compete on the provision of goods and services, not their ability to hire special interest lobbyist. For this reason, the small business community has shown such strong support for measures to close offshore tax loopholes. Sixty-four percent of small business owners support ending the ability of corporations to defer paying U.S. taxes indefinitely on income diverted overseas, according to a 2013 poll conducted by the Main Street Alliance and American Sustainable Business Council.

What you need to know about this emerging policy

For small businesses, where employees often work long hours and are earning more than $455 per week, the proposed rule could be significant. If multiple employees are routinely working beyond normal work hours, overtime pay could reasonably increase personnel expenses.

What dO you need to know about this emerging policy

A bill introduced by Councilwoman Helen Gym would require businesses that benefit from special tax incentives (valued at more than $50,000 per year) at the local or state level to publicly report the total value of subsidies they receive each year.

The bill also requires reporting on the number and quality of jobs created by businesses that receive subsidies.

6

Subsidy Accountability Bill