The Atlanta Lawyer May 2016 | Page 10

WORDS FROM THE WISE The Past and Present of The Atlanta Bar Answered by Our Past Presidents By Richard Caplan LeClairRyan [email protected] T he current strength of the Atlanta Bar Association is due in large part to the work of its past leaders. For this month’s issue of The Atlanta Lawyer, I reached out to five past presidents of the Atlanta Bar: David H. Gambrell (1965–66), currently senior counsel at Baker Donelson; Frank B. Strickland (1985–86), currently at Strickland Brockington Lewis; The Honorable T. Jackson Bedford, Jr. (1994–95), currently Deputy Chief Judge of the Superior Court of Fulton County; Paula J. Frederick (1999–2000), currently General Counsel of the State Bar of Georgia; and Lynn M. Roberson (2012–13), currently at Miles Mediation. I wanted to get their take not only the organization’s past, but where it might be headed in the future. Their answers to the same five questions follow. 1 When you took your position as leader of the Atlanta Bar Association, what goal(s) were you most focused on? Mr. Gambrell: The support for the organization of the State Bar of Georgia, in which members of the Atlanta Bar Association are participants, and maintaining good relationships with the local judiciary. Mr. Strickland: I was looking for a major project for the Atlanta Bar to undertake during my term. To my surprise, a federal judge presented the Bar with such a project. U.S. District Judge Marvin Shoob had granted habeas corpus relief to approximately 1,100 Marielito Cuban refugees detained without trial for several years at the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary. These detainees were represented by Gary Leshaw and Deborah Ebel and other lawyers at The Atlanta Legal Aid Society. Judge Shoob’s order was reversed by the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which left the detainees in a difficult position. Atlanta Legal Aid Society could not undertake 1,100 individual cases. Judge Shoob asked me if the Bar could undertake a project to provide representation for the Cuban detainees. With help and advice from my good friend, Steve Gottlieb, then and now the Executive Director of Atlanta Legal Aid Society, the Bar organized a program which recruited more than 400 volunteer lawyers, plus translators, who represented 10 May 2016 over 800 detainees in administrative parole proceedings. The Bar’s Cuban Detainee Program was recognized by the State Bar of Georgia as the outstanding pro bono program of the year in 1987 and the Bar received the Harrison Tweed Award from the American Bar Association for the outstanding project of the year, also in 1987. Judge Bedford: Energizing the Bar leadership, increasing lawyer participation in the Bar, expanding current programs and creating new programs to serve our members’ needs. The first thing I did the day after I was sworn in was to hold a 3-day professionally-guided Bar Leadership Retreat where we developed short term and long term goals for the Bar. Ms. Frederick: Pro bono was the theme for my year; I asked each of the Bar’s committees and sections to take on a pro bono project during the year and almost all of them did. In a couple of cases we worked with the Atlanta Volunteer Lawyers Foundation and the Atlanta Legal Aid Society to tailor projects to the interests of section members. Ms. Roberson: As my predecessor, Rita Sheffey, advised, “There is the Bar year you plan, and then there is the Bar year you get.” As president, my primary focus was ensuring a smooth transition as our long time executive director, Diane O’Steen, retired, and our new executive director, Terri Bryant, came on board in the middle of my term. Terri immediately hit the ground running and dedicated herself to our Bar’s continued success, so I was very gratified. 2 What was the hardest part about the job? Mr. Gambrell: I do not recall any part of the job which I considered “hard.” Most of it was positive activity and good fellowship. Mr. Strickland: Recruiting 400 lawyers for pro bono representation of Cuban detainees, but it was a challenging and rewarding project. Judge Bedford: Juggling my Bar responsibilities with the demands of an active trial practice and management of my law firm. Ms. Frederick: Figuring out how to engage members so that