TEACHING WRITTEN SKLLS COMMUNICATIVELY | Page 4

Preface Nunan (1989: 12) addresses the problems of content and methodology in language teaching quite clearly by stressing that ‘Although it is not immediately apparent, everything we do in the classroom is underpinned by beliefs about the nature of language and about language learning’. Concerning the former, almost everyone involved in the teaching business would agree today that language is something more than a system of rules, as its mere existence relies on the human need to communicate rather than on a need to master linguistic structures. So, a more appropriate definition would describe language as a structured system of communication. As far as the way language is learnt, the view that mechanical repetition can guarantee safe results is considered nowadays rather simplistic and dated, due to the fact that language is extremely creative. We everyday produce structures which are unique, which we have never come across before and this is something behavioural theories cannot explain. On the contrary, there are other factors such as motivation, the degree of exposure to the target language, in combination with social and cognitive ones which are now considered of much greater importance. Communicative language teaching has emerged as a need to provide answers to the above considerations. It is commonly described as an approach rather than as a single method, due to the fact that it provides general guidelines rather than specific instructions on how to teach language. This provides flexibility for the materials writer or the teacher, but it can lead to misinterpretations as well. Nikolaos Pozoukidis Kozani, January 2011 4