Teaching Testing and Time | Page 8

Methods and Study Overview As outlined above, this project sought to answer these key questions: • What are best practices in the selection and implementation of interim and benchmark assessments? • How do districts in Tennessee use data from interim and benchmark assessments to drive instruction and strategic decisions? • What challenges do district leaders, principals, and teachers face with assessments? • What type of interim assessments (vendor, subject area, grade level, etc.) are districts in Tennessee currently implementing and for what purpose? • How do districts select interim and benchmark assessments? What processes exist at the district level to select and evaluate interim assessments? • How much time do students spend taking assessments in Tennessee? To inform these questions, SCORE, in collaboration with the Tennessee Department of Education and other key partners throughout the state, developed and administered online surveys to teachers, principals, and school district leaders. SCORE also conducted a series of semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Teacher Survey The teacher survey instrument was designed to collect information in four key areas: (1) the amount of time spent on assessments in Tennessee; (2) the amount of time spent preparing for assessments in Tennessee; (3) the usefulness of data from interim and summative assessments; and (4) top challenges faced with assessments. The survey was administered in spring 2015 and all teachers in the state were invited by email to participate. SCORE sent two follow-up emails to all teachers in the state two weeks and four weeks after the survey was initially shared with teachers. A total of 13,057 teachers, or 20.3 percent of those eligible, responded to the survey. Appendix A contains a full version of the survey instrument. Principal Survey The principal survey instrument was designed to collect information in six key areas: (1) the amount of time spent on assessment; (2) the amount of time spent preparing for assessment; (3) concerns heard from teachers and parents related to assessment; (4) top challenges faced with assessment; (5) the purposes of assessment in their school; and (6) interim assessments they elect to implement that are not required by the district or state. The survey was administered in spring 2015 and all principals in the state were invited by email to participate in the survey by Directors of the Center of Regional Excellence (CORE). SCORE followed up with CORE Directors several times throughout the survey window to ensure emails were sent to principals in each region and to support CORE Directors with further outreach in regions with low response rates. A total of 286 principals, or 8.5 percent of those eligible, responded to the survey. Appendix B contains a full version of the survey instrument. District Leader Survey The district leader survey instrument was designed to collect information in six key areas: (1) the amount of time spent on assessment; (2) the amount of time spent preparing for assessment; (3) concerns heard from educators and parents related to assessment; (4) top challenges faced with assessment; (5) the purposes of assessment in their district; and (6) interim assessments they elect to implement that are not required by the state. The survey was administered in spring 2015 and all district leaders in the state were invited by email to participate in the survey by the Tennessee Organization of School Superintendents (TOSS). SCORE provided TOSS with a sample email that included a link to the district survey. SCORE followed up with TOSS multiple times throughout the survey window to ensure emails were sent to all superintendents and to provide additional outreach to districts that had not responded to the survey. A total of 69 superintendents, or 49.3 percent of those eligible, responded to the survey. Appendix C contains a full version of the survey instrument. 8