Teaching English in the Priy Classroom | Page 72

observed such as why teachers showed a preference to traditional teaching methods, or why there were some students who did not participate at all. Although all lessons observed had a clear structural orientation, the teachers expressed their belief that their lesson had been successful, and that their main aims and objectives had been achieved. Concerning the fact that there were many students who did not participate at all, the teachers’ view was that these are students who are completely demotivated, and that it is too late for them to follow, as their level is far below the average level of the class. Another assumption which was common among the teachers interviewed was that they consider essential for students to speak the language correctly from the first steps and this is the reason they provide them with supplementary grammar exercises as, according to their view, the ones contained in the teaching material are inadequate. It was for the same reason, they answered, that they provide students with immediate correction when they produce an erroneous utterance. Lightbown and Spada (1999: 118) refer to such an assumption shared by teachers as ‘get it right from the beginning’, stressing that it reflects audio-lingual approaches to language teaching. Teachers were also asked for the rationale behind putting students to read aloud and their answer was that reading aloud provides students the chance to improve their pronunciation. When teachers were asked why they resort to a word-by-word translation of texts, most of them answered either that it is the students who strongly demand it, or it is because they are afraid that if word is not explained, students will miss the chance of learning it. Concerning the first claim, it is worth stressing that, as Nunan (1986) has found, there can be clear mismatches between learners’ and teachers’ views of what is important in the learning process. It is for this reason that Dubin and Olshtain (1986: 30) emphasise that a period of ‘learning how to learn’ is vital for students in order to become responsible learners. As for the second claim, Hunter et. al. (2000: Unit 0: 7) stress that the fact that school provides students with only one chance for learning is one of the features which differentiate it from the outside world. In order for the school to simulate real-life situations, and to become more effective, teachers need to be more flexible and to constantly recreate opportunities for learning, rather than see their role as an evaluator of everything students dare to produce. 72