Re: Winter 2016 | Page 61

Training the brain also essential and goes hand in hand with physical exercise. So called ‘above the neck’ training aims to create an ‘athletic brain’ programmed to anticipate, read and react to many different scenarios without the need to physically engage in the sport, allowing an athlete to focus on and improve mental focus. For example, virtual games using cognitive training are thought to improve peripheral vision and reaction speed. (The game is played using a keyboard and computer screen). A similar approach was taken on U.S and Israeli Air Force pilots which improved performance in the cockpit by 30%. By now the 2016 Olympics in Rio seem a long distant memory, but it was a good result for Team GB this year taking home 27 Gold medals and coming second in the rankings. Can we do better next time round? And, more specifically, what can we learn about the benefits of applying neuroscience and technology to sport? When it comes to sport, the importance of an athlete’s mental state cannot be underplayed. Whilst an athlete’s physique, genetics and practice are important factors in gaining that all competitive edge, it would seem that the key to optimising an athlete’s performance lies in the brain and cognitive training. Players on the pitch and tennis courts undoubtedly face intense psychological pressure, and that’s mainly from the battle going on in their heads; we can see it written on their faces (and in the throwing of rackets during a tough game). Indeed, it is thought that performance is often the result of what’s going on in the mind. Players therefore often use techniques such as visualisation to focus the mind and improve performance. In a recent online interview (www. theplayerstribune.com/agnieszkaradwanska-tennis/) tennis player Agnieszka Radwańska stresses the importance of practice and planning: ”For years and years at practice, shot after shot, I plan, I strategize. So the moment that I actually step onto a court for a match, I don’t ha ve to think. It’s automatic. It’s second nature.” So how far can athletes and players push themselves to actually do things second nature, and effectively? Technology applying neuroscience is addressing exactly that by making it possible for athletes to think fast and perform almost automatically. After all, it often comes down to those crucial few seconds. But a little science first… The basic function of the brain is to govern behaviours, including movement. Areas of the cerebral cortex control movement through motor neurons (located in the spinal cord) which activate the various groups of muscles, thereby creating movement. So how significant is this to improving ‘thinking time’? Apparently it’s all about strengthening the connections between the neurons and muscles. Brain plasticity or ‘hyperplasticity’ is a term used to refer to the brain’s ability to create new connections when it learns new processes, as when learning a new language or learning to ride a bike. Team USA’s sprinters Michael Tinsley and Mike Rodgers sought that all competitive edge by wearing headphones (‘The Halo Sport’) whilst training which send an electrical stimulation to the brain, apparently creating stronger connections between the neurons and muscles. This also means that everything becomes more meaningful to the brain, including those vital moments when starting or finishing a race. But hyperplasticity isn’t enough to unlock an athlete’s potential. Cognitive training is Nike and The Retina Institute of Hawaii have teamed up to run a neurosensory and physical training facility where athletes undergo visual training and are evaluated on their level of visual clarity, depth perception and hand to eye coordination. However, it’s not all just mind (or brain stimulation) over matter; it turns out athletes are more quick thinking and efficient than non-athletes. Researchers at South China Normal University studied the effects of gymnastics training on the brain. They scanned the brains of gymnasts and found that nerve connections between the cortex and spinal cord were stronger and the areas corresponding to motor and attention more efficient. So it turns out that just physically engaging in a sport (or gymnastics) strengthens our cognitive abilities. It will be interesting to see what the techies come up with next in the world of sport. It also remains to be seen whether athletes will embrace cognitive training and technology as well as the effects this will have on overall performance. But let’s not forget about the bottom line, a lot of this will be costly and an athlete or team will need to be backed by sufficient resources and investment before they can reap the benefits of neuroscience and technology. Will there be a fair and level playing field in the future or, as with Formula 1, will a lot depend on the vehicle and technology? (Of course that’s not to undermine the impressive cognitive abilities of F1 drivers, but it’s only part of the equation to a good result). As with most things in life, only time will tell. By Carmen Calvo-Couto 59