Pro Installer October 2016 - Issue 43 | Page 28

28 OCTOBER 2016 PRO INSTALLER GGF NEWS www.proinstaller.co.uk QUESTIONS ABOUT INSULATING GLASS UNITS The Glass and Glazing Federation (GGF) has seen an increase in questions being asked about the ability of Insulating Glass Units (IGUs) to meet certain regulations. In particular, the questions concern durability of IGUs and if they conform to regulations such as BS EN 1279-5:2005 + A2:2010 and the Construction Products Regulation (CPR). The designs in question are those marketed as Thin, Slim, Heritage or similar names. These names do not refer to any specific component brand or tradename, and a more accurate description of the IGU would be ‘Narrow cavity IGU with reduced edgeseal sightline.’ The GGF has received a number of enquiries relating to such units and their durability. In some instances these units have shown evidence of failure of the edge seal construction through condensation developing in the cavity. This failure may be attributable to either the durability of this ‘reduced sightline’ edge seal design or the method of glazing. Given these units are used exclusively in timber frames and are generally glazed using a fully bedded method, both the IGU design and method(s) of glazing may be questionable. The cause of failure may be either of the above or a combination of both. The main issue in relation to durability is not about the cavity width - the industry has successfully produced 6mm cavity IGUs for many years. It is whether IGUs constructed with an edge seal depth less than that usually seen in standard IGUs, can be manufactured in accordance with the harmonised European Standard (hEN). The issue facing IGU manufacturers is caused by growing demand from clients, often as the result of planning requirements. Specifiers often require an IGU with a maximum cavity width of between 4-8mm. IGU manufacturers have responded to this growing demand by producing IGUs using a reduced height spacer bar and also reducing the amount of outer (secondary) sealant below that recommended by sealant manufacturers. Once these modifications to the edge seal are made, manufacturers cannot use their existing EN 12792, EN 1279-3 or EN 1279-4 test evidence to support their claim of compliance to the product standard when making a Declaration of Performance and CE marking these units. At present, the GGF has not been able to obtain copies of any IGU manufacturer’s test evidence for these ‘Narrow cavity IGUs with reduced edgeseal sightline.’ The GGF said that when manufacturing IGUs, it is the IGU manufacturer’s responsibility to ensure the products being placed on the market are manufactured in conformity with the product standard and have the necessary test evidence available. More information is available in the GGF Narrow Cavity leaflet: http://www.ggf.org.uk/ publication/narrow_cavity_leaflet GGF SHORTLISTED FOR G16 AWARDS The GGF has been shortlisted as a finalist at the G16 Awards in two categories: • Promotional Campaign of the Year for MyGlazing.com • Customer Care Initiative of the Year for the CTSI Approved GGF Consumer Code of Practice James Lee, GGF director of marketing and communications commented: “I am delighted we have been nominated as finalists in two categories at this year’s awards.” The nominations are clear recognition of the great progress the GGF staff has made on both MyGlazing.com and the implementa- tion of the GGF Consumer Code of Practice which gained approval from the Chartered Trading Standards Institute earlier this year. The announcement of the finalists also included 18 GGF members across all 12 categories. Nigel Rees, GGF Chief Executive commented: “It is particularly pleasing to see the GGF being shortlisted and my congratulations and best of luck to all members who have been nominated.” To see the full list of finalists and find out more about the G16 Awards please go to www.gawards.com/g-16-finalists/here. ‘The nominations are clear recognition of the great progress the GGF staff has made on both MyGlazing.com and the implementation of the GGF Consumer Code of Practice which gained approval from the Chartered Trading Standards Institute’