Popular Culture Review Vol. 26, No. 1, Winter 2015 | Page 17

Tyler says I’m nowhere near hitting the bottom, yet. And if I don’t fall all the way, I can’t be saved . . . I shouldn’t just abandon money and property and knowledge. This isn’t a weekend retreat. I should run from self-improvement, and I should be running toward disaster. I can’t just play it safe anymore . . . Only after disaster can we be resurrected. ‘It’s only after you’ve lost everything,’ Tyler says, ‘that you’re free to do anything.’ What I’m fe eling is premature enlightenment. (61) We hear the same sentiment in Choke when Victor tells us that “You [have] to get right to the edge of death to ever be saved” (3), as well as in Invisible Monsters when Brandy says, “‘Our real discoveries come from chaos,” and “‘You have to jump into disaster with both feet" (258, 260). As the Zen saying goes, you have to die on the mat to live. Victor’s understanding of enlightenment, though, is about as superficial and self-serving as that of Fight Club's narrator: for Victor, “enlightenment” means being “comfortable and confident in the world;” that, he says, “would be nirvana” (38). One would freely agree with this sentiment were Victor not making this statement about an online porn site he liked as a child which was composed of pictures of “this one dumpy guy dressed as Tarzan with a goofy orangutan trained to poke what looked like roasted chestnuts up the guy’s ass” (36). The “premature enlightenment” the narrator of Fight Club experiences is merely his ego fighting back. Until he fully embraces emptiness and nondualism by going “right to the edge of [the] death [of his ego] to . . . be saved” from the word of suffering, he will continue to greedily grasp at delusions of spiritual self-grandeur. As Dogen says of premature enlightenment, “Though you are proud of your understanding and replete with insight. . . you may loiter in the precincts of the entrance and still lack something of the vital path of liberation" (On Zen Practice 13). If he were truly trying to achieve liberation as Reed claims, it seems contradictory to desire the destruction of the planet as a way to “force humanity to go dormant or into remission long enough for the Earth to recover” (Palahniuk, Fight Club 116). Though this idea might have a romantic appeal for radical environmentalists, a Buddhist practitioner would not say things like: “I wanted to destroy everything beautiful I’d never have. Burn the Amazon rain forests. Pump chlorofluorocarbons straight up to gobble the ozone . . . I wanted the whole world to hit bottom" (114-115). Indeed, in this one-page diatribe, the narrator uses the first person T and “my” twenty-one times, highlighting the stranglehold maintained by his ego. Several of those T s , as with the two quoted above, are paired with the word “wanted," which is truly the 13