Popular Culture Review Vol. 25, No. 2, Summer 2014 | Page 113

109 enduring success lies in the fact that the “content of the mythic is enabled through the iconic abstractions of sequential art” (80). The second half of this study focuses on the challenges of capturing the mythic elements of Batman in different mediums from the 1940’s movie serials to the 1966 TV version, animated series, and contemporary films. Wainer spends a great deal of this time discussing the Christopher Nolan-directed trilogy. While lukewarm in his discussion of earlier adaptations of the Dark Knight, Wainer spends Chapter 7 waxed enthusiastic over the Nolan adaptation, which he sums up as, “creating a total history of Batman, a beginning, a middle, and an end, as with so many of the figures of myth and legend” (159). While Wainer’s study occasionally loses focus and becomes repetitive, there is a lot to love here. Despite the implication of the title, this work is more than a study of the mythic nature of Batman. Instead, it is a primer on the different aspects of the study of myth, an introduction to the history of the Dark Knight, a reader on comics as a medium and art form, and a discussion on the theory of adaptation. Weaved within this plethora of topics, not ever-present in the forefront, but always lurking in the shadows, is the Batman. This alone is well worth the price of admission. University of Nevada Las Vegas John J. May