Popular Culture Review Vol. 25, No. 1, Winter 2014 | Page 134

130 Popular Culture Review with paintings—on a similar wall covered with paintings. The mise en abyme quality of the painting’s quotation of its own setting reduces even the film’s characters to so many images among images. A second defining element of hypermediacy is the calling of attention to media as media, or what Mitchell describes as an emphasis on “process or performance rather than the finished art object” (Bolter & Grusin 31). Thus, Bolter and Grusin argue that, “[i]n the logic of hypermediacy, the artist. . . strives to make the viewer acknowledge the medium as a medium and to delight in that acknowledgement” (41-42). Consequently, in cinema, self-reflexivity or the use of film-making techniques that violate the Hollywood conventions audiences have been trained to perceive as “natural” creates a hypermediated viewing experience; both disrupt the viewers’ suspension of disbelief by reminding them they are watching a film. The Age o f Innocence is rendered a hypermediated viewing experience by Scorsese’s repeatedly calling attention to the film’s cinematic construction through such self-conscious techniques as elliptical dissolves, circling and virtuosic tracking shots, swish pans, slow motion, fades to brilliant colors, and the fading down of diegetic sound to demonstrate a character’s preoccupation. Similarly, during a conversation between Newland and Ellen in a theater box, diegetic sound is faded down to silence so as to present the couple as literally in a world of their own, oblivious to the crowd around them. Further, on two occasions, letter writers recite the letters’ content in direct address to the camera, a sharp departure from the conventional voiceover or sustained shot of the written page itself; it is as well a curiously unsettling choice, since the letter-writer is speaking to no one, the letter’s recipient being in a different geographical location in the film’s diegesis and the audience (to whom the words appear to be addressed) not being that recipient. A particularly pointed moment of self-reflexivity occurs in the scene in which May’s bridal photograph is taken. The scene begins with a close-up of May’s upside-down image reflected in a camera lens, an explicit illustration of the mechanics of the photographic process—of the manufactured nature of photography and, by implication, film. As the movie camera pulls back to reveal the diegetic camera on its tripod and May posing before it in her wedding gown, the photographer steps into frame. It is Scorsese, in a cameo appearance in which he doubles his role as one who captures the technological replications of reality. By taking a role that draws such attention to his role behind the movie camera.