Popular Culture Review Vol. 25, No. 1, Winter 2014 | Page 128

124 Popular Culture Review of linear perspective and in virtual reality computer systems, as both are “attempts to achieve immediacy by ignoring or denying the presence of the medium and the act of mediation. All of them seek to put the viewer in the same space as the objects viewed” (11). Similarly, they point to “[a] medieval illuminated manuscript, a seventeenth-century painting by David Bailly, and a buttoned and windowed multimedia application” as hypermediated “expressions of a fascination with media” (12). These twin preoccupations are found as well in Scorsese’s The Age o f Innocence, positioning it as a pivotal film between two present-day traditions in representing the past on film. Scorsese’s film is the third version of Edith Wharton’s 1920 novel. A silent version, of which all prints have been lost or destroyed, was released in 1924. In 1934, RXO produced a second film version, starring Irene Dunne as Ellen and John Boles as Newland, the starcrossed lovers, and Julie Hayden as May, Newland’s wife and Ellen’s cousin. In this film, the 1870s love story is set up by a narrative frame taking place in the 1920s, in which Newland, a widower, tells his grandson about his past. Thus, the love story is presented entirely in flashback, and within this flashback, the salient events of the novel’s love story are retained. When the flashback ends, Newland’s grandson offers to take him to Ellen, also widowed and living in New York, but Newland declines, stating that he wants “to remember [their love] as it was.” In the RKO film, despite the retention of the basic story, many narrative events from the novel have disappeared. In add ][ۋ]HوB