Popular Culture Review Vol. 22, No. 1, Winter 2011 | Page 78

74 Popular Culture Review regular time, creating discrete scheduling of time together, and the host and producers manage the creation of narratives over the time period. Rome will generally lay out the schedule of events—when there will be an open phone time for listeners to call in, when certain guests are scheduled to appear—throughout the show. The show closes with the “huge call of the day,” with the replay of the call that Rome and his staff have deemed most notable, and the traditional “bumper” music that closes out the show. There are also the boundaries that are associated with the sporting events that are covered. As listeners follow and await major events, there is considerable discussion with the anticipation of the event, in addition to the actual coverage and wrap-up after the event. The concept of the shared valent event hypothesis—^that the more the members assign importance to their shared events, the stronger the bond is likely to be—illustrates precisely how sports talk radio is designed. Although critics might argue that spectator sports are a meaningless distraction, unimportant in the larger scope of political and social life; popular culture clearly argues in support of the role sports play in conveying cultural values, and the many bridging and bonding possibilities have already been discussed (Putnam, 2000). Yet even without awareness of these contributions, sport’s importance as a cultural phenomenon is continually reinforced and heightened by the media. The media creates hype around athletic events such that this coverage often dominates the social landscape and hence, importance becomes attached to these events. Sports talk radio will spend weeks, sometimes months, building to a major event and dedicating entire shows to the analysis of a single game. Rome’s use of language—“epic” calls and listener “legends”—also begins the sense of the mythological proportions of the narrative (Reffue, 2006). Additionally, there are issues that arise on or around the playing field which become topics of greater social significance, and The Jim Rome Show has not shied from covering these issues. Concerns around spousal abuse, discrimination, and illegal substances have all populated the world of sport in recent years, and it is not difficult to assign importance to these topics. However, in addition to covering these, at times, controversial subjects. The Jim Rome Show takes the shared valent event theory to another level by generating a sense of importance about the show itself As Rome often states, the biggest topic on the show is the show. Rome and the callers often refer to the “karma” of the show, whereby athletes who give interviews on the show before a big game are rewarded with a win. The various callers/characters are promoted as part of the lore of the show, and the significance of their contributions culminates in the annual “smack-off.” This competition heightens the sense of magnitude attributed to the show, as callers are screened in weeks beforehand, attempting to gain entry into this exclusive field. The “smack-off’ is regularly lauded by Rome and other listeners as the most anticipated event of the year. As already discussed, investment refers to the idea that the level to which one invests in the group—in terms of time, energy, or even emotional investment and risk—^will increase the sense of community. Even the casual