Popular Culture Review Vol. 22, No. 1, Winter 2011 | Page 14

Popular Culture Review 10 14 there. In the end, Seltzer was unable to shoot on location in Las Vegas. Instead, he built a set in Los Angeles to simulate a downtown rooftop and a casino at a cost of $77,000.^^ So, whose story is the closest to the truth, Frank Seltzer’s or that of the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce? This much is clear. The chamber leadership rejected Seltzer’s script and refused to cooperate with him in any way. Much of the rest—Seltzer’s charges that he was initially threatened, then accepted by a couple of community leaders, and then threatened by a hotel owner and, finally, that three “torpedoes” threatened his film crew—cannot be confirmed. In Seltzer’s favor, his director, Joseph Newman, later said in an interview that the production company sought to shoot scenes at all the locales mentioned in the film. However, he said they “were thrown out of Las Vegas. They told us to get out and be out by midnight. We started to work in the casinos, and the powers in Las Vegas didn’t care much for the type of picture we were making, which showed the wire tapping and so forth that was going on.”^^ On balance, however. Seltzer’s decision to go to the Kefauver committee and the press with his story just days before the opening of his film, no matter what the credibility of his claims, was little more than a “publicity trick” as chamber of commerce president Vem Willis aptly characterized it. The more important question, however, is what the episode reveals about the community’s efforts to control the images that viewers saw of their city in the post-war period. Seltzer released his movie at a time when civic leaders and hotel owners worried about the connection many Americans were making between organized crime and their city. On June 20, 1947 an unknown gunman killed the celebrated gangster Benjamin “Bugsy” Siegel in the Beverly Hills home of his mistress Virginia Hill. Siegel was just beginning to enjoy a profitable run with his recently opened Flamingo Hotel in Las Vegas. Yet, he remained heavily in debt to a syndicate of organized crime figures including Charles “Lucky” Luciano and Meyer Lansky who had provided most of the funding for the construction of the property. Contemporaries assumed syndicate leaders had ordered the hit on Siegel because of his extensive cost-overruns and 17 the possibility that he or Virginia Hill were skimming some of their money. Stories about Siegel’s murder usually included photographs of his bloody, bullet-ridden body and, according to Time magazine, “the tabloids of Manhattan, the sensational papers of Los Angeles and, to a lesser degree, papers all over the 18 U.S. played it high, wide & handsome.” Inevitably, the hundreds of newspaper and magazine stories about the Siegel murder noted his link with Las Vegas, and it was this connection that caused chamber of commerce leaders like Maxwell Kelch to oppose Seltzer’s original script which would have moved the Siegel murder scene to Las Vegas. Even in the revised script for 711 Ocean Drive, there is a character clearly modeled on Siegel. The national syndicate sends Larry Mason to southern California to gain control of local gambling operations. In many accounts of Siegel’s career. Lucky Luciano and Meyer Lansky dispatch