Popular Culture Review Vol. 21, No. 2, Summer 2010 | Page 78

74 Popular Culture Review Jose Antonio Maravall and Jose Maria Diez Borque argue that the theater promoted traditional values and that it acted as propaganda for the elites; while many others, particularly in the American academy, saw the theater as a transgressive spectacle that sided with women and other oppressed groups for which the theater provided a space to confront the norms of society. In order to please a very diverse audience, the theatrical spectacle offered a melange of several pieces with different tones and themes. The main feature was a serious play that was accompanied by several comic shorter pieces, one of which was a dance performance. In this essay I analyze how dances relate to the ideology and conventions of the main play, using as an example three dances by Agustin Moreto: Baile del Conde Claros {Dance o f Count Claros), Baile de Lucrecia y Tarquino {Dance o f Lucretia and Tarquin), and Baile entremesado del Rey Rodrigo y La Cava {Interlude-like Dance o f King Rodrigo and La Cava). A dance was a brief show in which the actors presented a very simple comical story that always included a dance. Gaspar Merino Quijano explains that a dance frequently consisted of four elements: reciting, music, singing, and dancing (51). The dancing part could be a traditional dance or a dance specifically choreographed for the event. The popularity of the dances was such that when they were prohibited, the clientele of the theaters decreased dramatically, to the point that some companies required that contracts include a special clause specifying that they receive compensation if the dances were forbidden at any period by the authorities. Of all the parts that comprised a theatrical event, the dance was the one that concerned moralists the most. The variety presented in a spectacle by the inclusion of different genres and tones assured the success of the spectacle and increased the audience by providing something for everyone. The theatrical events required variety to achieve economic success, therefore the co-presence of a dance and a long serious piece responds not only to ideological and artistic reasons but also (and maybe mainly) to economic ones. John J. Allen studied the accounting and organization of the public theaters of Madrid and concluded that even though all classes were present in the audience and all paid different prices for their seat, the only ones that had a significant influence were on one side the administration and very high nobility and on the other the lower masses. The Consejo de Castilla censored the content of the plays and the guilds and the town hall managed the business, but the money came primarily from the cheapest tickets, that is, those sold to the lowest classes. Although the upper and middle classes paid significantly more money for their seats, in total, the biggest contributors were the lower classes, who were more numerous. Now that the importance of the economical factor has been established, I turn now to the close analysis of three dances to show their relations with the long serious plays. Whether one agrees with the interpretation of theater as promoter of traditional Catholic and aristocratic values, or on the contrary, sees it as the voice of rebellion against those same values, what cannot be negated is