Popular Culture Review Vol. 20, No. 1, Winter 2009 | Page 22

18 Popular Culture Review the technology of reality, just as access to a camcorder and a computer can make anyone the next on-line star, and a nationwide search for an American Idol can make anyone the next sensation. But I am not sure that we should be unquestioning fans of democracy. As a concept, it is today but a justification for war. And as a political term, it has absolutely no meaning beyond its use as an interjection. The best synonym for “democracy” is thus most likely “hurray!”— it is, I fear, a word used merely to indicate the United States’ approval of something. It was 1976.1 was nine, soon to turn ten, in the fifth grade. And the country had bicentennial fever. My small public school took every opportunity it could that year to celebrate democracy and freedom. Even the title of the December holiday pageant was “A Red, White, and Blue Christmas.” With all of the parents gathered in the transformed gymnasium, we sang carols and acted out bizarre sketches involving gingerbread men, Santa Claus, and George Washington. Mrs. Quayle, our music teacher, played the piano, and the finale of the holiday evening came when a young girl appeared at center stage to sing “Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer,” followed by a boy who sang “I’m Dreaming of a White Christmas,” followed by me, doing my best Elvis impersonation, singing “I’ll Have a Blue Christmas Without You.” I sang the song without irony—they hadn’t invented irony yet—but I sang it with a heavy heart because I was, from what had happened in the spring of the previous school year, utterly disillusioned with the notion of democracy. In May 1976 the teachers at Elmwood Elementary School decided that an appropriate way to celebrate our collective national greatness was to have each grade participate in a “democratic exercise” that would be filmed by the local television station as a week-long mini-documentary. They hadn’t invented the idea of reality television back then, either, but that, in effect, is what it was. Two students would be chosen to represent two sides of an important issue (because every issue has two and exactly two sides to it). One would take the pro and the other would take the con, and they would research their respective issues, present their findings to the gathered student body on Friday, everyone would take one week to think about it all and discuss it, then we would reconvene and all vote on the following Friday to see democracy in action. Each night on the local television news, they would show an edited version of what had happened the day before at school: our nation’s democracy being enacted by our nation’s future. Our issue was “Should we change our national anthem?” And I was assigned the pro position. I admit that I have always had a fondness for both Canadians and “O, Canada,” but at nine years old it had never much occurred to me to have a referendum to get rid of our own “Star Spangled Banner.” Still, I took the