Popular Culture Review Vol. 20, No. 1, Winter 2009 | Page 114

110 Popular Culture Review kind of foreign policy we actually get, or that it actually threatens the safety of her home and children” (Marshall/Eliot, 36). True, those lazy, buck-passing women enjoyed their movies and supposed newfound affluence. That they did not always love, or even acknowledge the entities behind those niceties irritated the power elite. As R.K. Simon surmised: “Lili has to leam to connect the entertainment she loves (puppets) with the people who provide it (puppeteers). It won’t do that she loves the puppets but hates the puppeteers.” American women, and indeed the non-Communist public world, needed to love the ugly, greedy battle-scarTed America behind the glitter and promise of its entertainment industry and foreign aid programs. More than that, they needed to actively support those programs. Lili was not a spectator at Paul’s puppet shows. She was an active participant in them. Lili’s interaction with the puppets was the novelty that ensured the show’s success. Likewise, the complicity of postwar Europe and American film audiences was critical if postwar capitalism under the leadership of the United States was to thrive. To accomplish these things, the world, in the person of Lili, needed the maturity to acknowledge American power and to recognize the factors behind it. Crowds of self-absorbed “little half-wits” could not further American interests. On the other hand, grown-up, self-sufficient Lilies were of little value if they did not also fear and depend upon the most daunting economic power in all of history. Pax Americana, like the carnival, depended upon the combined trepidation and enthusiastic support of its subjects. In the end, Paul learned an important lesson. He could not treat Lili like an object, a whore, or a piece of property. He needed to win her heart. He initially accomplished this through the puppets. However, when Lili tore down the puppet show curtain, and saw the face behind the puppets, she ran away, leaving the carnival for an unknown destination. Paul’s devastation at her departure made clear his dependence on her presence in his life, and of course, in his show. Paul needed Lili for financial security. At first, he seemed sure that Lili did not need to love him, as long as she stayed and performed with him. His admonition, “Theatre’s business!” says it all. “You don’t have to like me.” He was wrong, of course. Lili could not talk to puppets she did not believe in. She needed to love the force that made them real. In the end, Lili realiz ed that the puppets she loved were all Paul. In the eerie closing scene of the film, Lili embraces Paul, as the puppets applaud, apparently of their own volition. Lili’s recognition of Paul as the power behind the puppets gives the puppets life. Now, she can love them knowing their origin and continue to perform in Paul’s profitable show. Clearly, Lili stood to gain from the arrangement. She would have sustenance and security but at the expense of mature self-determination. She would be forever dependent but able, as always, to console herself with the puppets. The message for movie audiences was clear. Of course, viewers were expected to melt with the consummation of the romance between Lili and Paul.