Popular Culture Review Vol. 19, No. 2, Summer 2008 | Page 13

Flying and Smoking 9 advertisements, pleasurable risk-taking in the circus becomes clearly associated with consuming cigarettes. Penny Tinkler identifies how the “feminization of smoking” was largely “a visual phenomenon” and one replayed through representation (2006: 2). If athletic circus performers could make smoking seem alluring, as both physically daring and socially adventurous, these advertisements reiterate how the act of smoking signals female emancipation and potentially also sexual availability (Tinkler 2006). They co-opt images of health and glamour—the body’s social surface. An association of the bodily activity of smoking with the physical action of the circus produces further significance. As argued elsewhere, flying trapeze performers in kinesthetic motion can provoke visceral responses in circus spectators as they watch the performers doing mid-air leaps and jumps (Tait 2005: 141-151). Simone Dennis (2006) argues that the action of smoking is a bodily experienced phenomenon that advertising appropriates, so that these Camel cigarette advertisements can be said to surreptitiously align the bodily experience of smoking with the felt bodily thrills of viewing circus. This conceptual framing is discussed later in the article and implicates the lived body in relation to the seen movement of other bodies, through bodily engagement with and in the world (Merleau-Ponty 1996). The article’s larger point is that responses to popular entertainment are not only about the targeted appeal of associated words and images but also the conjunction of these with bodily sensations. These three Camel advertisements evoke a sensory body phenomenology of overlapping responses to flying and smoking. Visible Traces Recent cultural analysis of the circus has identified how promotional advertising was an integral part of the institution of the circus and its business and providing a precedent for entertainment industry marketing such as that of cinema (Stoddart 2000: 56; Davis 2002: 42-6). But in turn, advertisers benefited from the social spaces created by the mass audiences for the circus and its widely disseminated programs and magazines. Of special interest to an analysis of the circus is how the three Camel advertisements depict circus performance and offer unusually detailed information about an act that captures the performance history of a specific performer with, importantly, guidance about how spectators might respond. These are not simply functioning one-way in marketing cigarettes to consumers but they also promote the performance to spectators. Aerial performance is a particularly ephemeral art form and the verification of its achievements claimed in circus annals, including knowledge about the repertoire of a record-breaking act, is dependent on traces retrieved from print archives inclusive of performance trade advertisements. Therefore these Camel advertisements are useful historical sources. Print sources can be supplemented with the cinematic record after the 1920s, and usefully with films in which aerialists did the physical stunt work—both Concello and Fox perform aerial action in Cecil B. de Mille’s film, The Greatest Show on Earth (1952). An aerial