Popular Culture Review Vol. 19, No. 1, Winter 2008 | Page 113

BOOK REVIEWS 109 not emerged is any single work that attempts to address the full range of popular cultural and literary forms available to Shakespeare, and the impact they had on him” (4). Therefore, they intend Shakespeare and Elizabethan Popular Culture to fill this gap in scholarly inquiry. The roster of chapter-length essays in Shakespeare and Elizabethan Popular Culture includes: Helen Cooper’s “Shakespeare and the Mystery Plays,” Leah S. Marcus’s “Shakespeare and Popular Festivity,” Alex Davis’s “Shakespeare’s Clowns,” Helen Moore’s “Shakespeare and Popular Romance,” David Margolies “Shakespeare and Elizabethan Popular Fiction,” Diane Purkiss’s “Shakespeare, Ghosts and Popular Folklore,” Neil Rhodes’s “Shakespeare’s Sayings,” Stuart Gillespie’s “Shakespeare and Popular Song,” and Bruce R. Smith’s “Shakespeare’s Residuals: The Circulation of Ballads in Cultural Memory.” Each of these smoothly written and highly accessible pieces offers students, critics, and readers alike broad, yet specific insights into the subjects they treat individually and collectively. Many also include a complement of black-and-white illustration reproductions from the early modem period. “Endnotes” and a “Select Bibliography” aid further, more in-depth study, while an adequate, though not extensive, “Index” rounds out this gorgeously produced volume. Meanwhile, Robert Shaughnessy, editor of The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Popular Culture, reveals that, recently, “the study of the past and present relationships between Shakespeare and popular culture has been transformed: from an occasional, ephemeral, and anecdotal field of research, which, if registered at all, was generally considered peripheral to the core concerns of scholarship and pedagogy,” into “one which is making an increasingly significant contribution to our understanding of how Shakespeare’s works came into being, and of how and why they continue to exercise the imaginations of readers, theatergoers, viewers, and scholars worldwide” (1). Furthermore, current ongoing “research and pedagogy in the field of Shakespeare and popular culture is concerned with the Shakespearean theatre and drama’s immersion within the festivities and folk customs, entertainment industries, and traditions of playing of its own time,” as well as “in the reinvention, adaptation, citation, and appropriation of the plays (and, to a lesser extent, the poems), and the myths and histories that circulate around them, across a wide range of media in subsequent periods and cultures” (1). Shaughnessy, in some respects both echoing and expanding upon Gillespie and Rhodes, later comments that the notion of the “‘popular’ is itself hardly a singular or uncontested term or frame of reference: seen from some angles, it denotes community, shared values, democratic participation, accessibility, and fun;” while “from others, the mass-produced commodity, the lowest common denominator, the reductive or the simplified, or the shoddy, the coarse, and the meretricious” (2). Thus, in circumstances in which “the transmission and appropriation of Shakespeare are at stake, considerations of taste and aesthetic