Popular Culture Review Vol. 18, No. 2, Summer 2007 | Page 10

Popular Culture Review to convince the reader to stop turning pages, to end the narrative flow and avoid the inevitable conclusion. When reason and pleading fail to stop the progression of the story, he attempts to force the pages together—with rope, wooden boards, and bricks—to keep them from being turned; and still the reader, God-like in the desire and the will to see this to the end, forces the pages open one by one until the conclusion: a conclusion that finds only Grover himself at the end of the book, Grover the monster, Grover the beginning and end of the narrative, alone with his fear, his embarrassment, and his relief. Let us consider the possibility that this is a modernist allegory. As a metaphorical parable for our confrontation with death, the title of the book makes it clear that the finale—our collective shared finale—is set. There is no question, no question mark, no possibility of a different outcome. This fear of non-being marks our existence: if we refrain from turning the next page can we stop the monstrous end from coming? Plead and beg and fight as we might, our own death awaits us at the end. Reading allegorically each of Grover’s attempts to stop the flow, then, we can see the whole of human history bemoaning our mortality. Grover moves from tying rope to nailing boards to laying bricks. Like the Three Little Pigs who make their homes of progressively more trustworthy materials—at least so it seems—Grover attempts to avoid the Big Bad Monster who eventually comes to blow us all down. He turns to rope. As far back as 17,000 BCE, humans were making rope. It is a natural material, a stringing together of the fibers of date palms, flax, grass, papyrus, hemp, and animal hair. Such strings and vines and lines exist already in nature; rope is just a matter of putting them all together, twisting them into something that makes sense to us and is useful to us. And so are all the struggles of life and death, of an animate wilderness pulsing with life and with meaning. The spirits of animals and plants all around us, their stories and their presence intertwined with ours like loose strands of a grander story as we see ourselves in relation to them, our being in relation to their being. The pantheists look to the world, see the forces of nature at work, and put them together, twisting them into a picture that makes sense and is useful. Weaving together the fibers of the natural world, a worldview emerges. We will avoid our demise by making sense of it all, by using nature to bind us together, by pulling together disparate bits of life and death into a grand scheme that reconciles nonexistence with existence. In the Incan language a quipu is a knot as well as a collection of ropes and strings with bundled knots of various kinds. The Incans tied these knots in rope in intricate patterns used to store information and convey knowledge. Knots and ideas were tied and untied, leaving a bundle of rope that spoke a language meant to be felt as well as seen, whole stories passing over ones fingers in what anthropologist Gary Urton calls a “three-dimensional binary code.”^ Recorded in twisted strands of natural fibers were their desperate desires to speak to animal spirits, to their ancestors, to prepare to spend eternity with the Sun rather than in the damp ground alone. But the force of history—and Spanish conquest—ends the project. The stories make sense and give us