Popular Culture Review Vol. 18, No. 1, Winter 2007 | Page 20

16 Popular Culture Review This notion is far removed from the chef trade’s actual manual component, which ironically bears greater resemblance to its machine-age factory-labor nemesis. In the televised kitchen, for example, there is none of the division of tasks or relentless repetition of cooking professionally, certainly not the practicing of manual skills over and over. One should wonder: how else did they become second nature to the chef on television? On TV, the dish is made only once—not many thousands of times without variation because consistency is the least one should expect from a professional cook. What’s more, all of the manually tedious procedures involved in making a dish only once are omitted on television. The timesaving provision of mis-en-place prepared ahead and the film’s editing out or speeding up of the boring parts is crucial to avoiding dramatic redundancy. The TV audience need not watch the dicing of all four onions or endure the balling up of each and every meatball. On television, the chefs mystifying portrayal as a manual laborer coincides with a comparably powerful picture of the chef in the more executive role of cultural innovator. For the chef on television not only demonstrates command of time-honored culinary traditions and techniques but is also regularly presented as an inventor of new dishes, combinations of ingredients, fusions of world cuisines, and all manners of preparation and presentation. After all, though the Iron Chefs show off their manual dexterity, they also bring their best game of creative originality, bowling us over with dishes never before done. Moreover, any chef with a significant reputation who gets a gig on television will probably at some point be featured with a program or segment that identifies the chef with his or her particular culinary point of view. For Lagasse, it was his unique take on Louisiana classics in The Essence of Emeril and Emeril Live. Bobby Flay’s eclectic cuisine with a grill and a Southwestern accent has been showcased on, among other shows. Boy Meets Grill. The distinct combination of Swedish and Asian influences for which Markus Sammuelson is known has been evident on Inner Chef and 1 recall at least one feature of his signature restaurant Aquavit. Ming Tsai’s fusion was the centerpiece of his aptly named fornier Food Network program. East Meets West. To my mind, however, the ultimate representation of the chef as creative genius on television would have to be Bourdain’s No Reservations feature entitled “Decoding Ferran Adria.” Since the episode is chronicled pretty precisely in Bourdain’s collection of essays. The Nasty Bits (2006), there is no need to go into so much detail here. Suffice it to say that this glimpse of Catalonian chef Ferran Adria made the Iron Chefs look like traditionalists. Bourdain’s tour of the chefs Barcelona laboratory/workshop El Bulli Taller and one thirty-course, four-hour, chefs-table tour de force of a dinner at his restaurant, El Bulli, had me convinced that Adria must be the Leonardo da Vinci of postmodern culture. El Bulli is mind bending in the application of both science and art. It produces physics-defying, chemically and culturally unorthodox, and psychologically uncanny marvels of food that call for equally unconventional modes of working, and therefore conceptions of what a chef is.