Popular Culture Review Vol. 17, No. 2, Summer 2006 | Page 16

12 Popular Culture Review pernicious side effects of sexual expression prohibition: our desire to enter into a sender/destinatary relationship in order to exchange, or at least to receive, sexually explicit information prevents us from perceiving the human side of obvious sociological disasters, such as the lives of most prostitutes. Furthermore, the direct exploitation of sex through pimping is not even denounced, if only in financial terms; the viewer is left uninformed of the percentage of the take the pimp receives for every trick his “employee’' does. To the contrary, we are invited to see a “Pimp Award Ceremony,” therefore contributing to present pimping as all but a glamorous activity. Sexploitation here operates at two levels: the pimp exploits the prostitute and the cable network exploits our frustrated need for explicit sexual narration. In the end, there is no room left for a necessary sociological critique; hence, we render mundane the spectacle of sex for sale, as if this association were part of a vague natural order. Hookers at the Point could be considered as a fusion between the two shows previously discussed: candid conversations about sex but with prostitutes from all walks of the trade. This particular pomumentary is probably the grittiest of them all and retains some shreds of cultural dignity precisely because of its harshness. Regardless of how much we enjoy having a direct view upon a prostitute’s adventures, a thirty year old woman explaining seriously to the camera that her only way out is probably suicide tends to calm ardors significantly. There is no doubt that this show, as the others do, preys upon our needs for sexual narration; however, in the present case, the sexploitation is limited by its irremediably informative nature. It could be said that, instead of selling sex directly, Hookers at the Point sells sexual disasters, and hence, forces us to consider external factors to just sensual arousal. All the visual artifacts mentioned above, films and pomumentaries alike, participate in a generally voyeuristic tendency which has developed exponentially throughout the second half of the twentieth century, thanks to the multiplication of visual media and their increased accessibility. It is no surprise to observe that a new type of exhibitionism has appeared with the possibilities now open with the use of webcams and personal websites, and it was naturally just a matter of time before it became tied to sexploitation. As of today, internet sex sites gross a revenue of about $2 billion a year. Furthermore, there are literally thousands of North American couples who broadcast their sex lives on the net for a reasonable fee of about $15 to $20 a month. We are confronted here by a new type of spectacularized prostitution as well as by the loss of the individual values of intimacy and privacy. The system of sexploitation has convinced some of us to turn our own sex lives into a spectacle, turning our desire and fantasies to generating profits from casual onlookers. In a desperate attempt to disguise the exploitation behind exploration, one internet consultant has recently declared12 that web-sex allows people to explore their sexuality without the risk of real life encounters, empowering them to “have a private connection with someone who is not in your room" via the computer screen.