Popular Culture Review Vol. 17, No. 1, Winter 2006 | Page 53

Four Milligrams of Phenomenology 49 inhalation and exhalation as pivotal. These read, owing to the purposes for which they are used (in the one case, against the practice, and in die other, for the practice), as oppositionary frames. Understood as part of the same process, these frames are of course not at all oppositionary, nor must they necessarily occur temporally distinctly: where is the point at which exhalation becomes inhalation in the unreflected upon act of breathing? To argue that there would be such a point divides the fundamentally circular and continual practice of breath taking into component parts, which would make breathing and smoking highly reflected-upon acts that would undermine each as a habitual practice. I use frames of intercorporeality and dissolvability to explore smoking as a social practice that uses intercorporeal means to function, as do all methods of human sociality and communication. Intercorporeality/Dissolvability Smoke and the practice of smoking offer a sensual experience in which the quality of dissolvability is paramount. There are many aspects of this dissolvability, in terms of the character of the smoke itself, which renders the practice of smoking olfactorialy, audibly, visibly, haptically and taste senseable. Cigarettes themselves are dissolvable; one may view the reduction of a cigarette object to ashes. Cigarette smoke dissolves into the air into which it is expelled. We know from the anti-smoking lobby that chemicals in cigarettes, after a fashion, dissolve into the body of the smoker. We also know that smoking itself is capable of beginning a kind of dissolving process from within the body on the sense organs: smoking corrupts the seeing of the eye, the smelling of the nose, the tasting of the mouth and tongue. It can also restrict blood flow, especially to the hands, feet and genitals, which assigns it the capacity to render less sensitive our haptic systems. Smoke also dissolves other kinds of social and conversational boundaries. Asking ‘have you a lighter?’ of a group of persons unknown to you in the pub might lead any place. Becoming part of ‘the smokers’ at ‘smoko’35 brings a person into alignment, into space, into shared activity, with people who may well have otherwise remained unknown to them. The phenomenon of ‘the social smoker’ alters us to the fact that smoking, for some people, requires the presence of others in order to be undertaken at all. Smoking might also extend or continue intercorporeal relationships between people, not only due to its capacity to weave through the air and permeate the bodies of others, thusly connecting them to you, but owing also to the capacity of smoke to act as a metaphor of corporeal intertwinement. This metaphor is based on a sensual-corporeal logic of our experiences of smoke to connect. The post-coital cigarette, for example, if both parties were to smoke, might, in the curling, intermingling, and warm smoke, continue the warm, curling intermingling so recently passed, even as each party departs to opposite sides of the bed.