Popular Culture Review Vol. 14, No. 2, Summer 2003 | Page 60

56 Popular Culture Review egories: linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, bodily kinesthetic, musical, in terpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalist. Each of the main characters in the novels has at least one of these intelligences, and often more than one, but Harry Potter himself possesses a combination of intelligences seemingly guaranteed to make him highly successful. It is the combination within a community of such combined intelligences that Gardner believes highly important: ...that we each have a unique blend of intelligences—leads to the most important implication of the theory for the next millenium. We can choose to ignore this uniqueness, strive to minimize it, or revel in it. Without in any sense wishing to embrace egocentrism or narcissism, I suggest that the big challenge facing the deployment of human resources is how best to take advantage of the uniqueness conferred on us as a species exhibit ing several intelligences. (Gardner 45) One of the most marked examples of differences in intelligence combinations is the portrayal of Hermione Granger’s intelligences, much more the traditional linguistic/logical-mathematical, and Harry’s more comprehensive intelligence. Hermione is obviously highly intelligent and is particularly focused on learning as much as possible through endless reading and research. Frequently described as a “know-it-all” by both friends and enemies, Hermione is a model student, commit ting to memory whole textbooks during school vacations, and helping to solve each of the difficult mysteries presented in all four books of the series. Although most of her teachers are extremely complimentary toward her, and she stands at the head of her class, no one describes Hermione as gifted—intelligent, yes, clever, certainly, but never gifted. Hermione herself recognizes this by the end of the first book: Hermione’s lip tr