Popular Culture Review Vol. 14, No. 2, Summer 2003 | Page 55

Vampirism in Millennial Film 51 of three “brides” ensues and a number of vampiric traits are displayed during vari ous confrontation scenes between the vampire hunters and their prey. The decision to set the majority of the film in New Orleans serves to underscore the difference between this film and John Carpenter’s Vampires, in that the Carpenter film is remote and generally rustic, while Soisson and Lussier bring the vampire story into the very soul of contemporary urban life. What sets Dracula 2000 apart from other titles of its ilk, however, is the se quence that traces the title character’s beginnings to the time of Jesus Christ. Hav ing “looked at religious myth and folklore that dates back further than you could imagine (48),” Soisson and Lussier tell us the Count is none other than Judas Iscariot, whose attempted suicide following the betrayal is interrupted by God who then condemns Judas to eternal damnation as a vampire. (If Dracula’s exploits are any indication, his victims would likely feel this is not one of the Almighty’s better ideas.) Thus, the rope Judas has strung himself up with snaps due to divine inter vention, establishing a neat parallel with the film’s concluding scene when the Count is ensnared in a noose of steel cables only to be caught in the rays of the new-day’s sun. Handily enough, a large illuminated cross helps keep the vampire at bay while Mary and Simon (Jonny Lee Miller), Van Helsing’s helper, wait for the sun to rise and bum him away. This revelation of the vampire’s creation ex plains a number of paradigms in the film’s mythology, such as the vampire’s aver sion to silver (the silver pieces Judas was paid for betraying Christ) as well as the undead’s recoiling from things religious. One scene preceding the flashback of Judas’s downfall finds Dracula in a confrontation with Mary and Simon and being kept at bay as Simon holds a Bible. While the good book makes the vampire back off, he manages to set the book afire while warning the two to be careful who they place their faith in. Dracula 2000 leaves an odd taste in the mouth because the film’s creative team attempts to have it both ways. Viewing this title makes one feel as though Soisson and Lussier are trying to make a vampire film for the fans of the Left Behind series of books co-authored by Tim La Haye and Jerry B. Jenkins; an at tempt to appeal to hard-core fans of vampire lore while suggesting to fundamen talist Christians that it is all right to watch a film depicting blood drinking and such as a way to eternity as long as there is some Biblical core to the story and the bad guys get theirs by