Popular Culture Review Vol. 14, No. 2, Summer 2003 | Page 22

18 Popular Cullure Review with Universal’s last issue shown in only 1,600 theaters and the company losing $5,000 a week on the series (Fielding, 1972, 307-309). USIA Propagandistic Tactics In his study of the USIA’s use of propaganda, Leo Bogart (1995) held that the political rhetoric of the Cold War was an outgrowth of the “ideological self-righ teousness” of World War II. Terms such as “freedom” and “the Free World” could be used without a trace of cynicism or self-consciousness, indeed with the expectation that they would strike a responsive chord. As President Eisenhower said in an ad dress to Agency staff members in November 1953: “It [the Cold War] is conducted in the belief that, if there is no war, if two systems of government are allowed to live side by side, that ours, because of its greater appeal to men everywhere ... in the long run will win out” (1995, xvi-xvii). Meanwhile, former Assistant Secretary of State Edward W. Barrett stated that in the contest to win people’s minds, “truth can be particularly the American weapon” (1953, ix). Senator Homer W. Capehart char acterized the USIA’s mission during the Cold War as selling the United States to the world, “just as a sales manager’s job is to sell a Buick or a Cadillac or a radio or television set” (Bogart, 1995, xvii). Such rhetoric assumed that public opinion could be influenced and shaped throughout the world, and that those who ruled would heed it, “no matter how evil and ruthless they might be” (xvii). The USIA used a variety of media during the Cold War to disseminate its propagandistic messages, ranging from films to radio broadcasts to leaflets and books. Bogart (1995) noted that the USIA believed it was important to reach the same audience through a number of media, but acknowledged that problems of coordination loomed large for the Agency: It’s like trying to put out a daily newspaper with the same basic format in every country in the world” (157). Television overseas was utilized to a lesser extent, especially in developing countries. Of the estimated 105 million television receivers outside the United States and Canada at the end of 1965, “the bulk were in Western Europe (50,943,700), Eastern Europe (23,581,400), and the Far East (23,842, 300). Lagging behind were Latin America and the Caribbean (7,548,200), the Near East and South Asia (1,039,200), and Africa (313,000). Of the 7,584,200 TV re ceivers in Latin America, more than 5,215,000 were in only three na tions: Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. Despite hundreds of millions of people in India and Pakistan, they were served by fewer than 3,000 TV sets. As late as 1968, television remained a novelty in the Congo, and there were only a few hundred sets when Ghana’s television system opened in August 1965 (USIA, 1966b, 5-9).