Popular Culture Review Vol. 13, No. 2, Summer 2002 | Page 89

Buffy The Disciplinarian 85 which the criminars act against the sovereignty is revenged; in punishing a crime, therefore, “the intervention of the sovereign is not...an arbitration between two adversaries:.. .t is a direct reply to the person who has offended him” (47-48). In a similar way, the Council does not seem to be concerned simply with punishing those who break the law, but rather they treat all transgressions as direct affronts to their authority. In condemning Angel, for example, the Council reveals that it is more concerned with preserving its own codes than it is with justice, or, as Wesley tells Buffy, “It’s not Council pohcy to cure vampires” (“Graduation Day, Part One”). This emphasis on preserving authority is even more pronounced when the transgression is committed by one of the Council’s own members. For example, Wesley refers to Buffy’s desire to help Angel as “mutiny,” a term which seems highly extreme, and in the episode “Who Are You,” where Faith is chased for committing murder, the Council’s retrieval team says to her, “The Watcher’s Council used to mean something. You perverted it.” This accusation is shown to be doubly misplaced in that it not only reveals the Council’s megalomania but also their ineptitude; due to a magical device. Faith has switched bodies with Buffy, and the Council’s policy of following orders without question allows them to capture and accuse the wrong person. This episode also depicts the Council’s brutality: rather than returning Faith to the U.K. for trial, the Council orders her immediate execution, and thus Faith’s eventual confession to the police in “Sanctuary” depicts the legal system as a much more civilized and modem institution. (The legal system is rarely shown in such a positive light in the series; it is only in contrast to the primitive extremism of the Council that this is possible.) The Council applies the same extreme measures to all vampires and demons, measures that bear a striking similarity to what Foucault describes as the “limit of punishment”: “The dissymmetry, the irreversible imbalance of forces were an essential element in the public execution. A body effaced, reduced to dust and thrown to the winds, a body destroyed piece by piece by the infinite power of the sovereign constituted not only the ideal, but the real limit of punishment” (50). The show’s use of special effects to make the vampires explode into dust whenever they are killed would seem to be the most perfect illustration of this hmit, and the Council’s blanket use of this extreme form of punishment shows its medieval nature. By rejecting the Council, Buffy also rejects this excessive use of force. But perhaps the clearest way in which BtVS illustrates Foucault’s model of discipline and punishment is in the notion of the slayer itself. As the prologue to the show’s early episodes states, the slayer is a mystical figure who appears in each generation and who possesses superhuman abilities that allow her to combat the forces of evil. Buffy is not the only such slayer, but rather the latest in a long line of slayers who have all performed a similar function in society. Unlike a typical superhero, the power of the slayer in no way resides uniquely in Buffy herself, but