Popular Culture Review Vol. 13, No. 2, Summer 2002 | Page 48

44 Popular Culture Review This manipulation led to an interesting statistic during the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal. When Bridgets were asked how they felt about the sex part of the Chnton story and his lying about it, they didn’t particularly care. When Boomers and former generations cried, “Where’s the shame?!” Bridgets responded with, “Like you were any better!” That was the attitude expressed in a Letter to the Editor by one Bridget in response to a Boomer named Mrs. Fields: Mrs. Fields states, “The unmasked private man of sordid tastes cannot be a good public man with credibihty.” Does she mean the “unmasked private man” who is in office? I hope so, because history has unmasked many seemingly good public men with credibility as quite sordid characters.. .Thus, if one is well acquainted with history and contemporary sociology, he or she is not shocked by this “current event.” I am of the opinion that the same internal forces that drive elected men to great acts of leadership, drive them in other, less moral directions. They have tremendous strengths and equally powerful weaknesses. The same holds true for many of our great artists, athletes, writers and thinkers: Pablo Picasso, Ernest Hemingway and Martin Luther King to name a few. When I hear a disgusted pohtical pundit such as Mrs. Fields ask, “Is a president who degrades the dignity of the (Oval) office fit to be president?” I am equally disgusted —not at the president, but at such an asinine question coming from a pundit’s ostensibly partisan ignorance of history and truth. I think Mrs. Fields should be more careful when writing what amounts to an “in it, but not of it” inside-the-Beltway commentary. (EberhardtA14) Succeeding revelations proved that this writer was very astute pohtically, as senators and representatives were ousted for their own personal troubles and consequent hypocrisy. This “Do As I Say Not As I Do” parenting style is clearly evident in modern life when politicians such as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich championed absolutist moral standards and “family values.” When questioned about his own extramarital affairs, divorce, and failure to support his children, Gingrich asserts “a clear distinction between my private life.” When President Clinton was confronted by the press (not to mention his daughter Chelsea) on the bad example his cigar smoking set for his anti-youth-smoking-crusade, Clinton replied, “I don’t think that’s the point. The issue is whether children are smoking cigarettes” (Males 268). The disillusionment with authority, both pohtical and rehgious, extends as well for Bridgers into the family. With good reason: If boomers once boasted of never trusting anyone over 30, Xers have