Popular Culture Review Vol. 13, No. 2, Summer 2002 | Page 156

152 Popular Culture Review to procure this reform not through physical/financial reform, but through idealistic enlightenment. The poet’s duty, in this regard, is to enlighten the citizenry as to their universality within the particular. Specifically, Whitman views himself as the messenger of the people’s perfection right where they are. W ithin the issue of labor reform. W hitm an’s program was ultimately unsatisfying. While celebrating the working class through their descriptions and occupations. Whitman’s symphonic theory, but its nature, must embrace the status quo. Labor reform, with its concentration on profit and property, is inherently a concrete affair. Conservative and radical reformers, therefore, sought to define workingmen’s issues concretely. Whitman, however, looked to bridge the gap between these reformers through an abstract call for an enhghtenment as to the nation’s “strings” and their universal, inter-dependent magnificence. However, enlightenment as to the nation’s symphony doesn’t immediately put bread on the table or encourage a drunkard to work. Though Whitman’s moderate program would, in effect, seek compromise and reason (much as Madison envisioned his Constitution doing), it had, by its nature, no executor of laws or legislator of rules to bring about reform. Instead, it depended on its hundred-million “strings” to recognize their harmony with each other. In effect. Whitman’s vision of the national “song” freezes its “instruments” in place and embraces their issues and debates as part of the national harmony without seeking to rectify their particular discord. Whitman’s 1855 edition of Leaves o f Grass met with some critical success. Specifically, Ralph Waldo Emerson claimed to find “great joy in it” and said that he greeted the poet “at the beginning of a great ca ree r.H o w ev er, the first edition also met with disappointing sales. For a poet who sought to be a “referee” between the individual and the nation, this fact was an upsetting reahty. In 1856, Whitman lamented in his journal that “everything I have done seems to me blank and suspicious. I doubt whether my greatest thoughts...are not sh a llo w .W h itm a n ’s following edition would seek to rectify these paltry sales by including poems more conventional in meter and punctuation, with titles and a compact size for portability. In this change, we can glimpse the latter Whitman of popular memory who sought an enhghtenment as to the American symphony through packaging less radical and visionary. Whitman’s call for a moderate program had begun to influence his radical form as he sought a broader, all-inclusive audience. This transformation would be complete with the popularization of patriotic poems like “O Captain, My Captain!” and the image of the “Good, Grey Poet” of the 1880s. There are very few signs of Whitman’s symphonic vision in American labor/ capital relations today. Though similar ideals can be read into the pohcies of the Hoover administration’s “Associationalism” or the tacit cooperation between the UAW and GM in the Detroit of the 1980s and 1990s, these, in effect, were pro business visions veiled as mutually beneficial, organic programs. They were.