Popular Culture Review Vol. 13, No. 1, January 2002 | Page 24

20 Popular Culture Review course, it must ofifer representations of such sexuality, that is, of gay life. In discussing gay life on The Simpsons, I am mostly referring to gay male life, particularly as it centers on Waylon Smithers. Moreover, my use of the term ‘‘gay ■’ is meant to invoke the large set of styles and attitudes which make up that elusive thing known as the “gay sensibility.” In short, the gay sensibility borrows largely from the ironic camp associated with gay males, female movie icons, and drag queens. It is important to emphasize, however, that the gay sensibility is not the exclusive province of gay people. I believe that The Simpsons itself enacts and maintains a gay sensibility by numerous means—namely, by making abundant allusions to gay life and sexual orientation, flaunting a camp sensibility, toying with the fluid nature of sexuality, incorporating peripheral gay characters, and patiently charting the coming-out process on its one recurrent gay character, Waylon Smithers. I further believe that The Simpsons, contrary to most mainstream media, promotes a progressive political agenda by foregrounding a gay sensibility, maintaining a gay character in a major recurring role, and overtly critiquing the oppression of sexual “minorities” in American culture. Homosexuality on the Periphery Until quite recently, gay life was not widely reflected in America’s popular arts. Over time, therefore, gay men and women have had to look very hard to find representations of themselves, positive or otherwise. As Andy Medhurst eloquently puts it: Denied even the remotest possibility of supportive images of homosexuality within the dominant heterosexual culture, gay people have had to fashion what [they] could out of the imageries of dominance, to snatch illicit meanings from the fabric of normality, to undertake a corrupt decoding for the purposes of satisfying marginalized desires. (328) In the wake of Stonewall and the organized gay political movements of the late 1960s and early 1970s, Hollywood made some concession to the presence of homosexual men and women in American culture. Nonetheless, during this same time period, gay characters in Hollywood film by and large either committed suicide or were murdered by another character. On television, something similar was happening. As John Leo points out, during the 1970s many well-meaning and self consciously liberal television shows tried to acknowledge gay life and offer direct representations of homosexuality (31). Notable among these bt q AII in the Family, Maude, and Soap, which gave us Billy Crystal as Jody, prime-time’s first recurring gay character. However, these shows often portrayed gayness as a “problem” to be