Peace & Stability Journal Volume 5, Issue 3 | Page 24

April 2014, DoD Energy policy was updated from the previous 1991 version. Included was an emphasis both on the increased use of renewable energy [SETM] and mechanisms to assess and evaluate those operations using it.41 The offices called to expand energy resources including renewable sources [SETM] include the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Combatant Commands. Those offices will increase focus on operational energy policy with interagency partners that support UN PKO. Further evidence U.S. DoD is moving incrementally towards the use of SETM in PKO is found in the new DoD Energy policy including Security Cooperation into its policy as it applies to a wide range of activities across the Department, including the direction to, "Incorporate guidance and analyses in Combatant Command planning to address energy risks and opportunities across the full range of military operations, from engagement and security cooperation to major operations and campaigns." Peacekeeping operations are within the terms of that DoD Directive, number 4180.01.42 Conclusion Less developed member nations of the UN system seek UN PKO intervention to help maintain their human rights and uphold international laws of armed conflict. Those who seek UN support to rebuild after climate change caused natural disasters and man-made conflicts are in positions of extreme need, often with their short and long term lives in peril. Some LDCs are aware of the state of SETM technology and seek only to rebuild their electrical infrastructures with today’s modernity. Some LDCs have never had electrical infrastructure and have limited access to learn about such technology. In both cases, whether the limitations are financial and/or technology based, taking advantage of those in need by providing them analogue and outdated generations of electrical power supplying technology at low cost is not in keeping with the intent of Millenium Development Goal (MDG #7). LDCs would appreciate the SETM and the jobs they create. According to the Center for American Progress, “Clean-energy investments create 16.7 jobs for every USD$1 million in spending. Spending on fossil fuels, by contrast, generates 5.3 jobs per USD$1 million in spending.”43 All member nations benefit, as nations whose economies are based on their natural fossil fuel resources are themselves converting to SETM.44 Peacekeepers lead the way and would lead better with SETM. The UN DPKO works within its COE policy to provide feasible materiel and logistics policy for the delivery of goods and services to UN PKO. The COE processes can be improved according to UN auditing offices. How UN PKOs are financed and budgeted is already well established. New policy revisions need only be made to include SETM categorized contributions. 22 The World Bank is firmly established to handle such financing and has adopted similar processes for bringing power to post conflict/disaster reconstruction for decades. UN procurement offices have models from preliminary efforts already made. Finally, the benefits of both SETM and UN PKO are evident when considering the vast majority of LDCs that ascribe to the UN MDGs are also individually benefitting from both. The discussion of the use of SETM in LDC UN PKO is largely a political one. With all political discussions, the political gains and losses in democracies are found in their citizens’ votes and willingness to accept, implement, and practice the policies promulgated by their elected officials’ actions. If SETM implementation in U.S. Army trained UN PKO is to successfully be implemented, it is essential implementation takes place as a result of supporting the member countries citizens’ will to participate. That will to participate and assist in the development of those societies into nations achieving the UN MDGs is strengthened by the use of SETM in UN PKO. Notes: “List of Least Developed Countries", UN, January1, 2014 (accessed July 18, 2014) http://www.un.org/en/development/ desa/policy/cdp/ldc/ldc_list.pdf. 2 “SPIDERS Industry Day Implementation Considerations”, Burns and McDonnell and U.S. Department of Energy, (accessed September 1, 2013) , http://www1.eere.energy.gov/ femp/pdfs/spiders_implementation.pdf 1 Andrew Mayer is a Security Assistance Analyst for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Under Secretary for Policy, Defense Security Cooperation Agency. Andrew transferred to DSCA from the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE)/European Command Liaison Office in the Pentagon. Before working in the Pentagon, he returned from working as an instructor, professor, and Soldier in the Republic of Korea for 10 years between 1997-2009. Andrew attended the Mark O. Hatfield School of Government, Portland State University, obtaining his Master’s Degree in Public Administration, Management, and Policy focused on international solar policy; a full program, in-residency, 65 graduate-credit degree. Andrew also holds a Bachelor of Arts, Social Sciences, and a Bachelor of Arts, Journalism and Communications, both from the University of Oregon.