Optical Prism March 2016 | Page 22

New Treatment Many ECPs are not familiar with the new forms of treatment for Amblyopia. It is recommended that they consult with an expert in the industry to ensure proper treatment. “The best thing an ECP who is untrained in managing these conditions can do is to search for a developmental optometrist whose practice emphasizes this type of work. Patients need to know that there is something that can be done, and that these are less medical conditions than functional ones, and the best trained to deal with theses are developmental optometrists,” said Boulet. “These are not permanent conditions, necessarily, and in most cases great improvements can be made within 6 months or less. These cases should be monitored more closely and require active therapies. ECPs can certainly use prism and lenses to assist unaffected clients and parents to understand to some degree how these conditions feel.” He added ECPs should also remind people that these conditions are not a simple matter of seeing blur, but that vision is multifaceted and that these conditions will consequently impact on motor skills, cognitive skills, and emotional state. It is often difficult to keep kids engaged in Vision Therapy. It can require many hours of work on the part of the child and the parent. Boulet said a team effort is required on the part of all involved to see success. “First, ensure there is an appropriate Rx in place. OD’s and MD’s all too often will prescribe the cycloplegic refraction as the baseline/habitual Rx. This is almost always contraindicated in children as they will most often choose to disregard the Rx by looking over the top of the frame,” he said. “Strabismus treatment, in particular, requires ongoing work at home, and the treating facility needs to work with the family to ensure they are on task and motivated. The referring ECP should ensure they check up with the family to also encourage adherence to the treatment program.” He noted traditional eye patch treatments can still be useful, however, the variety of alternatives means kids should no longer have to wear them for extended periods of time. “Patching was traditionally used as the sole primary treatment tool, with children wearing them full time for up to several years. We know that this approach often loosens binocular function and leads to increased time strabismic. Because vision is designed to be binocular, treatment is best approached as a binocular system, or at the outset at least as a bi-ocular system (each eye viewing different targets but in the same visual field),” he said. “We also know that aniseikonic/ isophoric lens designs can also be more effective than patching in cases of refractive amblyopia and that this approach is often more agreeable to patients as it serves to boost binocular vision, not suppress it.” He noted ECPs should do their research before recommending a surgical option. He noted surgery will have no impact on amblyopia if there is no strabismus. He said surgery can be helpful in some cases of immovable strabismus, but most often, these cases are not assessed by developmental optometry. “The best approach in terms of safety, cost, and outcomes is to turn to OVT first , then surgery, if it’s still indicated, followed again by OVT to reduce the need for repeat surgeries. Surgery approaches the visual system as a mechanical entity, so very much like an automobile or computer where if a part is out of alignment or no longer working, it simply needs to be ‘fixed’ or replaced,” he said. “Human physiology is not at all like this and therefore, treatments by surgery often require repeat procedures because the brain still has not learned operate both visual channels as a team.” >>> RESOURCES > www.shawlens.com > www.aboutkidshealth.ca > www.eyeresearch.ca