Optical Prism March 2016 | Page 14

THE RIGHT CONTACT By Jackie Muise THE QUEST TO IMPROVE VISION THROUGH AN ARTIFICIAL LENS THAT ACTUALLY MAKES CONTACT WITH THE SURFACE OF THE HUMAN EYE HAS BEEN A DETERMINED PURSUIT FOR MORE THAN 500 YEARS, BEGINNING WITH DA VINCI’S RUDIMENTARY LOOKING-THROUGH-WATER EXPERIMENTS TO TODAY’S RESEARCH INTO SURGICALLY IMPLANTED “BIONIC LENSES,” PROMISING TO ONE DAY RENDER VISION THREE TIMES BETTER THAN 20/20, REGARDLESS OF AGE OR INFIRM. 12 Optical Prism | March 2016 Between those two extremes, however, the average modern day contact lens wearer has benefitted from improvements to contact technology by a developmental renaissance of sorts over the last 60 years, accelerating at an astounding rate during just this past decade. It’s a progression that has taken us from glass lenses covering the entire surface of the eye, to various synthetic plastic materials covering only the cornea (the clear eye-tissue over the iris and the pupil), to the very latest in electronic “smart-lens” technology. Today, in addition to a huge range of replacement options, everything from daily to annual, contact lenses fall into two fundamental categories: soft lenses that are made from moisture holding, pliable plastics; or the “breathable” gas permeable (GP) contact lens made of a sturdier, less bendable plastic. The GP’s are also known as RGP’s, or Rigid Gas Permeable, although they should not be confused with the now nearly obsolete hard lenses. Both categories offer a range of designs to accommodate many kinds of vision issues and both have their advantages and disadvantages. The custom fitted considered the choice for corrective, sharper vision, are longer lasting and less likely to harbour bacteria.