Onside | Page 23

ONSIDE / INTERVIEW Ian Battersby [email protected] 01942 271 746 Ian Battersby is responsible for Seneca’s relationships with wealth managers and intermediaries and evolving investment strategies. EIS has been around for a long time hasn’t it Ian, so why the surge in popularity? Yes it has and over the last few years it has grown considerably. Commentators are expecting over £2 billion to be invested into the EIS market this tax year. Pension rules have capped amounts that high rate tax payers can invest into their pensions and there are very few genuinely tax advantageous investments available to investors. Moreover, the ‘renewables’ space has also contracted this year as investments which already attract subsidies are largely no longer eligible for EIS reliefs. Also, at the time of going to press, the future for Venture Capital Trusts is less than clear just to compound things. And does HMRC continue to support EIS? Yes, though there have been changes announced through the Budgets in March and also in July 2015, partly to bring the UK into line with Europe on State Aid, but also to ensure that the tax reliefs which are available to investors are being properly utilised in the provision of capital to companies who are growing. This creates growth and employment in a vital sector of the UK economy and ensures that Treasury are providing all round value for UK taxpayers by managing the use of these reliefs appropriately. So is it purely about investors who pay a large amount of tax seeking to reduce their tax bills each year? That’s an interesting one! Tax reliefs help mitigate the investment risk and so if there is minimal or no investment risk attached then you ought to ask whether it’s within the spirit of EIS. Our belief is that EIS should first and foremost be an ‘investment led’ decision not a ‘tax led’ decision and that seems very much the direction of travel with the recent HMRC announcements too. The tax reliefs are given to support growth in the SME market and anything which is wide of that is likely to fall foul. In any event, EIS is simply one mechanism for Seneca to provide capital to suitable businesses and so the investment rationale always has to stand up and the businesses we invest in, we would do so irrespective of tax reliefs because we think the investment case is strong enough to support the investment upside potential. Generally however, ‘doing it purely for tax’ isn’t likely to be a theme that sits well with HMRC for investors going forward. 23