GeminiFocus October 2014 | Page 12

the gap between the more well-studied stellar-mass and supermassive varieties. Full results appear in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, (viewable here). Figure 3. Radial surface brightness profiles of NGC 4151. The Gemini/NIFS data (red) measure stellar features only (which is most relevant to the determination of black hole mass), so they do not show the increase of central surface brightness due to the AGN, which is evident in the Hubble Space Telescope (green) and Ohio State University Bright Spiral Galaxy Survey (blue) images. Testing Black Hole Mass Measurements in an Active Galaxy Supermassive black holes characterize galaxy nuclei, and their masses scale with stellar properties in their hosts. This shows that black holes are fundamental to galaxy formation and evolution. With quiescent galaxies, astronomers usually employ dynamical techniques to measure the black holes. Active galactic nuclei (AGN) — which are “active” in the sense of accreting material — offer distinct techniques for the measurement of their central black holes. Specifically, reverberation mapping can reveal the size and motion of nuclear gas, and therefore the black hole mass. Each of these approaches is independently successful, but very few galaxies allow the results to be compared directly. NGC 4151 is an exception, being close enough for reliable dynamical measurements and also having an AGN subject of reverberation mapping campaigns. It also raised questions, as an apparent outlier from usual relationships between stellar properties and black hole mass. Christopher Onken (Australian National University) and colleagues provide new dynamical measurements that take advantage of improved spatial resolution from the Near-infrared Integral Field Spectrometer and adaptive optics in observations from Gemini North. They find a black hole mass of 3.8 x 107 MSun, which is lower than previous measurements (obtained using lower resolution observations) and is consistent with reverberation mapping results. Isolating measurements on small spatial scales emphasizes the region that is within the black hole’s sphere of influence and avoids complications from a bar that is dynamically evident on larger scales. The resulting velocity dispersion, σ, is somewhat larger than previous measurements, with the net result of putting NGC 4151 closer to the general relationship between MBH and σ, though still on the side of lower velocity dispersion. In addition, the researchers demonstrate the complication of galaxy bars in such measurements of black hole masses, predicting a discrepancy in the results obtained depending on the presence of a bar. Complete results appear in The Astrophysical Journal (view here). Nancy A. Levenson is Deputy Director and Head of Science at Gemini Observatory and can be reached at: [email protected] 10 GeminiFocus October 2014