2014-15 State of Education in Tennessee | Page 31

(THEC) has published an annual Report Card on the Effectiveness of Teacher Training Programs. This report card includes data on program completers’ performance on Praxis exams, Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) data, and teacher placement and retention rates.76 Since the initial publication of the report, THEC has worked with teacher training programs, the State Board of Education, the Tennessee Department of Education, and other stakeholders to redesign and improve the report. Based on feedback gathered during these discussions, THEC plans to include data from the Tennessee Educator Acceleration Model (TEAM) and other alternative teacher evaluation models in future report cards.77 These annual report cards have the potential to inform prospective teachers’ decisions about where to pursue a degree in education, hiring decisions made at the district and school levels, improvement practices in teacher preparation programs, and policy shifts in teacher preparation at the state level. Teacher Evaluation: In addition to improving the quality of teacher preparation programs, it is critical to provide current teachers with the feedback and support they need to continually improve their instruction. With the passage of the First to the Top Act in 2010, a new teacher evaluation system was put in place.78 This teacher evaluation system was implemented for the first time in the 2011-12 school year and required teachers to have annual performance evaluations that incorporated measures of student learning. The Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation, and Development’s (TNCRED) First to the Top survey found that Tennessee teachers have developed a more favorable view of the teacher evaluation since it was first implemented. For example, the percentage of teachers who felt the teacher evaluation would improve their teaching grew from 38 percent in 2012 to 53 percent in 2014. Additionally, the percentage of teachers who said feedback from the teacher evaluation system is more focused on judgment than on improving teaching decreased from 27 percent in 2012, to 19 percent in 2014.79 Teachers who participated in SCORE’s 2014 Listening Tour reported similar feedback on the evaluation after three years of implementation, noting that the teacher evaluation promotes more meaningful conversations between teachers and principals.80 The teacher evaluation system also provides more in-depth and comprehensive information to teachers, principals, district leaders, and policymakers than was previously available, ensuring that decisions ranging from professional learning opportunities to teacher placement can be made with a more robust set of data. The classroom observation component of the teacher evaluation has elevated principals’ role as an instructional leader in their school. Even so, on SCORE’s 2014 Listening Tour, some principals and evaluators noted challenges faced in the implementation of the classroom observation.81 Centers of Regional Excellence (CORE) offered additional support to schools on the classroom observation by placing TEAM coaches in schools to train and support evaluators. TEAM coaches worked alongside administrators in these schools, serving as co-observers to ensure evaluators established a deep understanding of the classroom observation rubric. The Tennessee Department of Education found this strategy effectively improved agreement between different evaluators. For this reason, CORE offices will continue to offer schools the support of TEAM coaches in the 2014-15 school year. In addition to school-level supports, TEAM coaches provided district-level and regional support on the implementation of the teacher evaluation. TVAAS and the Teacher Evaluation: A foundational component of the Tennessee teacher evaluation is the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS). While other measures of student outcomes included in the teacher evaluation focus on student achievement, TVAAS instead focuses on the amount of growth students make during the school year. Diverse stakeholders such as district leaders, school leaders, and teachers, have voiced concerns related to the 31