Military Review English Edition May-June 2014 | Page 86

BOOK REVIEWS century multinational operations. Numerous nations converged on China in the late 19th century as the sole remaining frontier for colonial growth, dividing primarily coastal areas—captured land—for trading posts and naval resupply stations. At the same time, the long-standing governance structures based around a Chinese emperor were quickly disintegrating. The environment of weakening local power and increasing incursion of Western cultural, religious, and military might created a backlash among disillusioned Chinese. As in the past, conservative locals rallied around groups that adhered to the religious and cultural principles they felt were slipping away; in 1900, this took the form of the Boxers. On the other side, descriptions of how colonial nations attempted, and ultimately failed, to join forces to put down the rebellion were of particular interest. David L. Silbey comprehensively covers the events of the Boxer Rebellion, from the dynamics creating the conflagration to the Western response and the ultimate results. He obviously knows the subject well and uses a plethora of primary and contemporary sources, as well as other analyses of the events of 1900. However, as is the case with many histories written by Western authors, the sources are predominantly those of the English-speaking nations, missing the other side of the narrative. Overall, The Boxer Rebellion and the Great Game in China is a great linear description of the events of 1900. However, it leaves much to be desired as a compelling story that could educate the uninitiated. I do not recommend the book for those seeking an engaging story of the Boxer Rebellion, but I do recommend it for those who are attempting to develop a comprehensive understanding of why and how this event occurred. Capt. Nathan K. Finney, U.S. Army, Cambridge, Massachusetts THE UNITED STATES MILITARY IN LIMITED WAR: Case Studies in Success and Failure, 1945-1999 Kevin Dougherty, McFarland & Co., Jefferson, NC, 2012, 227 pages, $40.00 T HROUGHOUT ITS HISTORY, and especially since 1945, the U.S. military has engaged in 84 far more low-intensity conflicts than conventional wars. Recognizing this, the 1993 edition of U.S. Army Field Manual 100-5, Operations, recognized a separate category known as operations other than war. Although this term has fallen out of favor, retired colonel Kevin Dougherty argues for the continued validity of the principles it represents: perseverance, objectivity, security, unity of effort (for coalition operations), legitimacy, and restraint. To explore this topic, the author considers eight dissimilar military actions of the post-war era. Four generally were successful—U.S. assistance during the Greek Civil War, the 1958 intervention in Lebanon, the 1965 Dominican Republic intervention, and the 1980s confrontation with Marxist Nicaragua. Four operations failed: the pacification aspects of Vietnam, and ill-defined interventions in Beirut (1982-1983), Somalia, and Haiti. Dougherty’s conclusions sometimes seem self-evident, but they are useful. The keys to success, he argues, are perseverance, objective, and sufficient security to protect the troops while helping convince the population the operation is legitimate. As in any military operation, failure to specify and focus on an achievable objective often led to disaster. In the second Beirut operation, for example, he says there was no clear mission because no political agreement existed on the ground. However, U.S. forces had to operate under restrictive rules of engagement as if they were engaged in peacekeeping. There are a few flaws with the study. The author accepts the traditional interpretation that the Greek Civil War was a deliberate communist attempt to seize power, whereas revisionists have argued persuasively that the right wing leaders of the royal government and army were so determined to repress all leftists that they forced the leftists to revolt in self-defense. Many of the events in the book are now so unfamiliar that readers would benefit from maps for general orientation. Such minor questions do not detract from the real value of the study. In an era when internal defense, stability, and contingency deployments remain common missions for U.S. troops, this selection of case studies correctly emphasizes the enduring issues that should guide military planning and analysis. As such, Dougherty’s book is worthwhile reading for professional soldiers and the general public. Col. Jonathan M. House, U.S. Army, Retired, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas May-June 2014 MILITARY REVIEW